Friedrich Gentz, Edmund Burke, and Mary Wollstonecraft

"How does Friedrich Gentz distinguish between the American and French Revolutions? Do you see the influence of Edmund Burke in his thinking?


Friedrich Gentz distinguishes very particular differences in the American and French Revolutions. He saw the American Revolution as a defensive measure to uphold the rights that they had for over a century. He sees the French Revolution as an offensive measure which tried to pull down French society's fabric and reupholster it.

To answer the question about whether or not I see Edmund Burke's influence in the thinking of Gentz, ultimately yes. I believe that I do see this influence, or at least, I see extreme similarities between these two people's thinking patterns. Burke and Gentz both thought that society is built over time and not simply ripped apart and put together again in a mismatching puzzle piece fashion. Burke had a very conservative thinking process. As stated before, he didn't believe it correct to put together a completely new society in a heartbeat, so to speak. He saw long-standing institutions as being there for a reason. If one existed, for let's say, a thousand years, it's probably a good assumption that there's a reason for this institution being around.

There you have it. Friedrich Gentz, Edmund Burke, the American Revolution, and the French Revolution–distinguished, explained, and pieced together in blog/essay like proportions.



"What points is Mary Wollstonecraft making in the excerpts you read from the beginning of A Vindication of the Rights of Woman? What would she like to see changed in European society?"




In the excerpts I read I found that Mary Wollstonecraft had a deep yearning to see girls educated and given deserving rights of the human species. She likewise thought that women ought to be treated as rational individuals and not simply like alluring objects for a man's short-term fancy.

Allow me to include this excerpt by Mary Wollstonecraft in which she is speaking to the female gender:

  "My own sex, I hope, will excuse me, if I treat them like rational creatures, instead of flattering their fascinating graces, and viewing them as if they were in a state of perpetual childhood, unable to stand alone."

Simply stated, she didn't particularly enjoy women acting like they had no real intelligence.

I conclude then that Mary Wollstonecraft wished to see women educated, respected even of themselves, and being able to stand on their own two feet in a male-dominated European society.

Thanks for reading!    

The French Materialists, Adam Smith, and the War of the Austrian Succession

"Explain the views of the French materialists."


The views of the French materialists revolved around the basic principle that everything was purely matter. Matter was basically their answer to life's questions. They tended to believe that due to the assumption that a person was simply matter/machine, then they should go about seeking sensual pleasure. One particular main view was that of an atheistic presumption. That there is no spiritual realm since everything is just matter. The views of the French materialists were, just as the name implies, focused on the material world.



"What does Adam Smith mean by the 'invisible hand'?"


Adam Smith is using the term of the "invisible hand" to describe the way that the actions of an individual to suit their needs actually ends up affecting society as well. This is the "invisible hand"; That there is an "invisible hand" guiding the market into it's various correct crevices and gaping holes. In effect, arranging the business world like a big 1,000 piece jigsaw puzzle.



"Discuss the causes and consequences of the War of the Austrian Succession."


The War of the Austrian Succession was caused by Maria Therese not being accepted as the ruler of the Hapsburg properties. This inconvenience was used by Prussia and France to challenge the Hapsburg ruling. The consequences that ensued include Austria losing Silesia to Prussia, and Louis XV of France losing much respect due to his decision to give back his fought for earnings to his defeated. This was done so that he would not look as if he was a conqueror. His people wanted what they fought for, and for the most part, they didn't get it.

Thanks for reading!