Friedrich Gentz, Edmund Burke, and Mary Wollstonecraft

"How does Friedrich Gentz distinguish between the American and French Revolutions? Do you see the influence of Edmund Burke in his thinking?


Friedrich Gentz distinguishes very particular differences in the American and French Revolutions. He saw the American Revolution as a defensive measure to uphold the rights that they had for over a century. He sees the French Revolution as an offensive measure which tried to pull down French society's fabric and reupholster it.

To answer the question about whether or not I see Edmund Burke's influence in the thinking of Gentz, ultimately yes. I believe that I do see this influence, or at least, I see extreme similarities between these two people's thinking patterns. Burke and Gentz both thought that society is built over time and not simply ripped apart and put together again in a mismatching puzzle piece fashion. Burke had a very conservative thinking process. As stated before, he didn't believe it correct to put together a completely new society in a heartbeat, so to speak. He saw long-standing institutions as being there for a reason. If one existed, for let's say, a thousand years, it's probably a good assumption that there's a reason for this institution being around.

There you have it. Friedrich Gentz, Edmund Burke, the American Revolution, and the French Revolution–distinguished, explained, and pieced together in blog/essay like proportions.



"What points is Mary Wollstonecraft making in the excerpts you read from the beginning of A Vindication of the Rights of Woman? What would she like to see changed in European society?"




In the excerpts I read I found that Mary Wollstonecraft had a deep yearning to see girls educated and given deserving rights of the human species. She likewise thought that women ought to be treated as rational individuals and not simply like alluring objects for a man's short-term fancy.

Allow me to include this excerpt by Mary Wollstonecraft in which she is speaking to the female gender:

  "My own sex, I hope, will excuse me, if I treat them like rational creatures, instead of flattering their fascinating graces, and viewing them as if they were in a state of perpetual childhood, unable to stand alone."

Simply stated, she didn't particularly enjoy women acting like they had no real intelligence.

I conclude then that Mary Wollstonecraft wished to see women educated, respected even of themselves, and being able to stand on their own two feet in a male-dominated European society.

Thanks for reading!    

Epicureanism and Ancient Liberty

                 Ancient Liberty Compared to Today 

     As you can probably guess, the liberty of the ancient world (specifically Greece, which is what I will be focusing on today) was very different than today's world.  For instance, the ancient's idea of freedom was more focused on the whole community, whereas we are focused on mainly the individual.  The ancients seem to have thought more along the lines of,  "If I can participate in politics, then I am free." Whereas, we think along the lines of,  "If I can own a business, have a family, participate in whatever religion I see fit, go to and from where I live, etc., I have liberty."

     Let's take Sparta for instance.  In Sparta, people had very little freedom.  Spartan boys were taken away from their homes and went through military training up until they reached the age of twenty.  That's when they were entered into the citizen army and were finally allowed to marry.  They were not allowed to live with their families until they reached the age of thirty.  Once they were thirty years old, they could live with their families but they still had to eat at a public mess hall.

     Now we get to the part where they participate somewhat in politics.  Every Spartan male over the age of thirty was a part of an assembly of citizens.

     In Athens, we do not see such a strict military district, but we do see Athens focusing mainly on the community as a whole rather than on the individual.

     For instance, if there was a certain number of votes regarding to the banishment of a person from Athens, he would be banished.  The person may have not even done anything!  The people may have just seen him as a threat to their future.

     Needless to say, we find many things lacking in the liberty of the ancients, but then again, I'm sure that they would find things lacking in our liberty.  It's funny to me how every point in history finds it so easy to see the things wrong with the other point, but not of itself.  I hope that we will not forget the things lacking in our liberty as I find it wrong to criticize other times in history without noting that we also face difficulties in our own time regarding our liberty.

                       Epicureanism

     Epicureanism is based on the teachings of Epicurus.  The "mystery religion" was founded about 307 BC, and taught that pleasure is the ultimate good.  But not just being a pig about what you indulge in. Epicurus thought that a simple life and no pain was the greatest pleasure.  They believe that to much of a good thing is a bad thing because it results in displeasure, but that you should not deprive yourself of pleasure.

     Let's use drinking and eating as two examples.  If you have only a little wine, you will have pleasure, but if you have a lot of wine, you don't feel good the next day.  The same thing goes for eating to much.  You shouldn't eat to much because that results in displeasure, but you should not deprive yourself of eating.

     Epicurus believed that everything was made of atoms but we still have free will.  This is a challenge to the atomists who believed that everything is just made of atoms bouncing around and that no one really has free will.  They believed this because if everything is the result of atoms bouncing around, then our thoughts and actions are also just the result of this.

     Epicureanism teaches that gods do not interfere in human matters.  It also says that gods are made up of atoms.
   
     I hope that you have enjoyed this essay, and please let me know what you think!